04/15/2008
from the Kennebec Journal
ATTACK SURVIVORS BATTLE ON
Assessment scores reveal mixed results
Baldacci's weapon to fight energy crisis: 'Yankee ingenuity'
RANDOLPH Officials differ on expenses
Woman's body found in river
Richmond chef is top lobster cook
Hunt resigns as Cony boys basketball coach
O'Brien on 'big stage'
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
FAIRFIELD State closes store Jim's Variety loses seller's certificate over sales tax issue
WATERVILLE Searchers find body
'Our lives will never be the same again'
State school officials encouraged by test results
Colby gives library $75K Gift will go toward renovation effort
RAIN DELAY HALTS DRAWDOWN
HERSOM, HUSSEY FACE A CROWD
Teams ready to go
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Speaker of the House Glenn Cummings has proposed two modest but essential measures to limit legislators' ability to vote on issues in which they have a personal, financial interest, or to do business as private citizens with government agencies whose budgets they oversee as legislators.
On Monday, the Senate voted to ditch those two reforms. But you won't be able to find out who voted to pass the reforms and who voted against them because the good members of the Senate did not -- as they could and should have -- record individual votes.
If the Senate wants to kill significant ethics reform, senators have that prerogative.
But if they're going to do that, they should have the courage to do it on the record.
There are still votes to be made on this proposal, and we challenge the members of the Legislature's upper body to be accountable and take their stand on ethics reform publicly.




Reader comments
Click here to view or add reader comments