Morning Sentinel
There is another side of the story
of wind power project in Freedom
Mary Ann Bennett lives in Freedom. She can be reac Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel 10/08/2007

"Facts are to the mind what food is to the body." -- Edmund Burke

It is not wise to make judgments without facts, as has been done by the Morning Sentinel in its recent editorial about wind power projects.

Many people, including the editors of the Sentinel, think that the group of neighbors who oppose the wind turbine project in Freedom do so because they do not want it in their backyard.

The issue is far more complicated than that.

Here are some of the facts that the Sentinel should have researched if it were to write a legitimate editorial.

Competitive Energy Services has created a limited liability company, Beaver Ridge Wind, to own this project. As the name implies, the owner's liability is limited to only one asset -- the turbine project. This also makes it easy for Competitive Energy Services to sell off its project to a larger organization so it can take advantage of the income tax shelter benefits.

There is also the possibility that things will not go as planned and bankruptcy will occur. This is a real fear because Beaver Ridge has been classified as a wind zone two, and most industry experts recommend siting wind projects in areas identified as a wind zone four or higher for the best profits.

We have no commitment from the company to remove the turbines and restore land if they become no longer economic to operate and the lucrative tax benefits have been exhausted.

We are worried that Beaver Ridge Wind will then not want to retain ownership and/or spend the money needed to maintain production as wind turbines age and repair or replacement costs rise, as has happened in other areas. At that point, the company may resell or perhaps even abandon the project.

Without the town of Freedom's commercial site ordinance, its residents have nothing in place to protect us from this scenario.

We are also worried about living in the shadow of the huge machines and experiencing their noise.

"Sometimes the turbines make a gentle whoosh, but there are times when they make such a thumping that it will drive you crazy," said Wendy Todd of Mars Hill, who lives about the same distance from turbines as Freedom residents would if the turbines were erected.

"It wakes us up; it keeps us from getting and going back to sleep. On days when it is bad, it becomes difficult to do anything that requires quiet. Reading, homework, even visits with friends and family have been interrupted by the repetitive rush and thump of the turbine blades.

"It's not just us, there are 17 other families who live about the same distance away who are experiencing the same things.

"Many wonder how they will be able to continue living in their homes if something isn't done about noise levels," she said.

These are just a few of the legitimate concerns we have that keep us working at protecting our way of life on Beaver Ridge.

Here is a quotation from your editorial: "You think you're tired? Imagine how the volunteer, citizen members of these boards feel? Or the folks just trying to build their climate change-fighting, non-fossil-fuel-polluting windmills?"

I notice you did not mention us, the neighbors of this project, the people who will be affected the most. I can tell you that we are indeed very tired. We are tired of the misinformation that has been circulating and of people ignoring all the research we have done because they think we are a biased source.

Why is only information from those who will make large profits at our expense accepted as completely accurate?

There IS another side to this story.

Mary Ann Bennett lives in Freedom. She can be reached at dbmben@fairpoint.net

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

Astraea of Freedom, ME
Oct 8, 2007 5:42 PM
Oops,the writer left out a few facts:
1.Bias is inherent in neighbors who has been fighting this project for 1 1/2 years. So,yes,it is fact that the NIMBYs are a biased source.
2.The not-in-my-backyarders seem to think it is their business who buys, sells,or keeps this project.It is not.If the project is making money, why would CES sell it? If it is going broke, why would anyone buy it? Think this through.
3. The NIMBYs worry that the project will go bankrupt because there is not enough wind. An anenometer recorded enough wind for 18 months to justify a 12 million dollar investment.
4.They are concerned at the idea that the turbines may (A)Make noise, and (B)Stop running due to bankruptcy,or abandonment. Hmmm, don't they put it together that if they stop running, they will stop making noise?
5.The not-in-my backyarders fear the town is vulnerable to the turbines being abandoned,left towering there, not functioning. Oops,they keep forgetting that the leaseholder is legally bound,in their lease on the land,that they will remove the turbines in the eventuality that they are no longer operating. In reality,they expect a 40 year life, and more likely would decide to replace the turbines with the latest high-tech models in the year 2048.
6.Oops again, they keep forgetting to mention that the complaints from Mars Hill came before those turbines were "tuned up" and adjusted. DEP did sound studies and found no problems. Most of the opponents in Freedom live a half mile away, and will likely not even hear the soft swishing. And,oops,here we go again forgetting the facts:the Freedom turbines will have equipment installed called "governors" that will keep the blade speed and swishing sound below prescribed decibel levels.
7.While a few people may think that right vs. wrong means what is right for them and their small self-interest, we can be thankful that the vast majority of us think that right means for the greater good, of both the Freedom tax base and environment.report abuse
James Gorman of Winslow, ME
Oct 8, 2007 5:51 PM
You have a valid concern and opinion. As a parallel example, you may have read about the Halifax dam debate in Winslow. A fully functioning hydro facility that the people in town overwhelmingly want to keep. Florida Power and Light proposes under pressure by fishing clubs that are strongly supported by the Sentinel to remove only 80 feet of the dam and leave the sewer line exposed. This will cause an eyesore, hazard and expense to the town. They will not sell it to a willing buyer taking tax dollars out of the economy. They thus shift the perceived need to build more green power to such things as wind turbines. The Morning Sentinel's position – That those who object only want dams because they’re in our backyard. I think we groups should join forces and support each others position for sensible solutions. report abuse
Carrie B of Freedom, ME
Oct 8, 2007 9:25 PM
Here we go again...Astraea of Freedom; why don't you share your real name? Could it be that you and I both know that the little 1, 2, 3 facts you spew are nothing more then a load of what I muck from my horses stall each day?
1-We "NIMBY'S are no more biased then CES or the greedy individuals such as yourself that have decided a tax break for yourself is more valuable then my home is to me or my children.
2-Our concern over the sale of this project is very justified and should be a concern to all of the residents of Freedom. As it stands right now; we have nothing but the "good word" of CES that they will meet the same noise limits that were required by our previous ordinance. It is their "word" that we are depending on to repair our roads that they damage and to pay for the necessary training of our fire fighters. We have no protection, no guarantees, we have only the word of Andy Price; we took away all of our protection when we removed our ordinance.
3-We are concerned that this project will go bankrupt because we have done our homework and found multiple projects in low wind class zones which have gone bankrupt. This project has been planned by Richard Slikman; he has a history of over estimating when it comes to his economic projections for the state of Maine (just Google his name) so why should we trust his ability to project the profits on this project?
4-CES themselves could not supply the Town of Freedom with adequate proof that they could meet the noise requirements; this is exactly why they lost their original building permit. If they go into bankruptcy or abandon this project, the town is stuck with three rusting, aging, eyesores, and no ability to remove them. It is true that they would no longer be making noise, but the fact that you don't care that they would be standing there, worthless and rusting over this Town says all too much about you. I happen to love this ridge and don't feel that this is a risk which should be taken on this land.report abuse
Carrie B of Freedom, ME
Oct 8, 2007 10:03 PM
5-Of course we fear that these turbines will be left abandoned and not functioning! OOPS! ANDRAEA doesn't seem to understand the ins and outs of a lease agreement; you have to go to court to uphold that agreement if one side defaults. As we all know, Mr. Price doesn't have the finances available to sue CES or any other company to enforce his lease agreement; thanks to the removal of our ordinance, the town now has NO recourse on this issue. It will be a civil matter between Ron Price and whatever company owns the turbines. Therefore, if these turbines stop running, they will sit there and rot, and when they become a safety hazard the town will have to pony up the money to bring them down. You voted to remove the protection for the abutters, but you won't be able to vote your way out of the safety hazard they will impose on abutting property since they are less then the fall zone from property lines. Furthermore, no turbines have a life expectancy of 40 years; this is a prime example of why we have no faith in CES! They may have a hope of their turbines running for forty years and they preach this fact to our town, but talk to a couple of manufacturers or EXPERIENCED wind farm owners; they will tell you it is more like 14-20 years depending on environment conditions and maintenance.
6-OOPS again for you my dear! The Maine DEP report showed that the turbines were exceeding the allowed 50 dba and this was not before "adjustments" were made. Mars Hill is a continuing problem for those that live there; I welcome you to take a trip up to meet the neighbors of that wind plant with me. Perhaps you can tell them why they deserve to be unable to sleep at night because people like you want to feel "green" and enjoy a tax break. As for your whole theory on "governors" for the turbines goes, well let me catch my breath after laughing myself out of my chair! I suppose you received this "amazing" guarantee from the letter CES sent out to the town??report abuse

Show all 5 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.