10/08/2007
from the Kennebec Journal
Rep. Pingree hears varied proposals for health-care solutions
HALLOWELL Fire that cut communications labeled arson
MONMOUTH Police defended after slim budget rejection
State's schools chief to parley
Wasser will lead newsrooms at KJ, Sentinel and in Portland
BRIEFS
Hockey still in picture for Harrington
Portland boxer to face legend's son
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
$1.3 MILLION FOR HEALTHREACH
Families Matter grows to meet special needs
Chellie Pingree listens to ideas on health care reform
FARMINGTON Rain alters plans for 4th of July
District regroups after budget failure
Vote on county budget hits snag
Burnham driver wins checkered flag at 2 tracks on same day
Maine boxer gets unique opportunity
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
It is not wise to make judgments without facts, as has been done by the Morning Sentinel in its recent editorial about wind power projects.
Many people, including the editors of the Sentinel, think that the group of neighbors who oppose the wind turbine project in Freedom do so because they do not want it in their backyard.
The issue is far more complicated than that.
Here are some of the facts that the Sentinel should have researched if it were to write a legitimate editorial.
Competitive Energy Services has created a limited liability company, Beaver Ridge Wind, to own this project. As the name implies, the owner's liability is limited to only one asset -- the turbine project. This also makes it easy for Competitive Energy Services to sell off its project to a larger organization so it can take advantage of the income tax shelter benefits.
There is also the possibility that things will not go as planned and bankruptcy will occur. This is a real fear because Beaver Ridge has been classified as a wind zone two, and most industry experts recommend siting wind projects in areas identified as a wind zone four or higher for the best profits.
We have no commitment from the company to remove the turbines and restore land if they become no longer economic to operate and the lucrative tax benefits have been exhausted.
We are worried that Beaver Ridge Wind will then not want to retain ownership and/or spend the money needed to maintain production as wind turbines age and repair or replacement costs rise, as has happened in other areas. At that point, the company may resell or perhaps even abandon the project.
Without the town of Freedom's commercial site ordinance, its residents have nothing in place to protect us from this scenario.
We are also worried about living in the shadow of the huge machines and experiencing their noise.
"Sometimes the turbines make a gentle whoosh, but there are times when they make such a thumping that it will drive you crazy," said Wendy Todd of Mars Hill, who lives about the same distance from turbines as Freedom residents would if the turbines were erected.
"It wakes us up; it keeps us from getting and going back to sleep. On days when it is bad, it becomes difficult to do anything that requires quiet. Reading, homework, even visits with friends and family have been interrupted by the repetitive rush and thump of the turbine blades.
"It's not just us, there are 17 other families who live about the same distance away who are experiencing the same things.
"Many wonder how they will be able to continue living in their homes if something isn't done about noise levels," she said.
These are just a few of the legitimate concerns we have that keep us working at protecting our way of life on Beaver Ridge.
Here is a quotation from your editorial: "You think you're tired? Imagine how the volunteer, citizen members of these boards feel? Or the folks just trying to build their climate change-fighting, non-fossil-fuel-polluting windmills?"
I notice you did not mention us, the neighbors of this project, the people who will be affected the most. I can tell you that we are indeed very tired. We are tired of the misinformation that has been circulating and of people ignoring all the research we have done because they think we are a biased source.
Why is only information from those who will make large profits at our expense accepted as completely accurate?
There IS another side to this story.
Mary Ann Bennett lives in Freedom. She can be reached at dbmben@fairpoint.net




Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
Regardless of how this all ends in court, I will say this; I thank God that I have conducted myself in a fair and honest manner and that those on my side have done the same. We may have won a vote or two had we been willing to sink to the same level as our opposition, but we all agreed early on that we would not compromise ourselves in such a manner as that. Regardless of what has been done or how any of our names have been slandered, we know that we have done what is right; we have been honest. We cannot help if there are those that are unwilling to listen or to see for themselves; or that some see this as a way to strike back at one man which they dislike. All we can do is to continue to try and inform people of the facts and pray that they will listen.report abuse
6-OOPS again for you my dear! The Maine DEP report showed that the turbines were exceeding the allowed 50 dba and this was not before "adjustments" were made. Mars Hill is a continuing problem for those that live there; I welcome you to take a trip up to meet the neighbors of that wind plant with me. Perhaps you can tell them why they deserve to be unable to sleep at night because people like you want to feel "green" and enjoy a tax break. As for your whole theory on "governors" for the turbines goes, well let me catch my breath after laughing myself out of my chair! I suppose you received this "amazing" guarantee from the letter CES sent out to the town??report abuse
1-We "NIMBY'S are no more biased then CES or the greedy individuals such as yourself that have decided a tax break for yourself is more valuable then my home is to me or my children.
2-Our concern over the sale of this project is very justified and should be a concern to all of the residents of Freedom. As it stands right now; we have nothing but the "good word" of CES that they will meet the same noise limits that were required by our previous ordinance. It is their "word" that we are depending on to repair our roads that they damage and to pay for the necessary training of our fire fighters. We have no protection, no guarantees, we have only the word of Andy Price; we took away all of our protection when we removed our ordinance.
3-We are concerned that this project will go bankrupt because we have done our homework and found multiple projects in low wind class zones which have gone bankrupt. This project has been planned by Richard Slikman; he has a history of over estimating when it comes to his economic projections for the state of Maine (just Google his name) so why should we trust his ability to project the profits on this project?
4-CES themselves could not supply the Town of Freedom with adequate proof that they could meet the noise requirements; this is exactly why they lost their original building permit. If they go into bankruptcy or abandon this project, the town is stuck with three rusting, aging, eyesores, and no ability to remove them. It is true that they would no longer be making noise, but the fact that you don't care that they would be standing there, worthless and rusting over this Town says all too much about you. I happen to love this ridge and don't feel that this is a risk which should be taken on this land.report abuse
Show all 5 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.