06/19/2009
from the Kennebec Journal
FAIRPOINT PLAN TARGETS DEBT
Wind project off Mass. meets strong resistance
Three bills seek tougher rules for petitioners
New rules for special education debated
Happy apples
AUGUSTA: Cuts to French curriculum run into opposition
HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL: Hall-Dale drops MVC title game to Mountain Valley
HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY NOTEBOOK: Different stakes in Gardiner-Winslow rivalry
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
'At the time ... he was psychotic'
Man answers door, is attacked with Mace and then robbed
FairPoint reorganization plan aims to slash company's debt
Concerns over special-education changes aired
FAIRFIELD: Clinton man, 21, arrested on rape, assault charges
Stun gun, arrest of suspect end high-speed, 2-town chase
HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY NOTEBOOK: Gardiner, Winslow take to ice again
GIRLS BASKETBALL: Skowhegan wins KVAC A title game
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Footprints in the snow.
Fingerprints on a milk glass.
Forensic-science techniques were at the forefront of testimony Thursday on the fourth day of the murder trial of Thomas H. Mitchell Jr. in Franklin County Superior Court.
Three forensic scientists working at the Maine State Police Crime Laboratory -- a biologist, a chemist and a latent-print analyst -- showed jurors how they did the work that led to the 2006 indictment of Mitchell in the Jan. 6, 1983, slaying of Judith L. Flagg in her Fayette home.
Cathy MacMillan, who conducts DNA analysis in that lab, used a wooden pointer to direct jurors through a PowerPoint presentation on how DNA profiles are determined.
Forensic DNA is used to show a relationship between victim, suspect and crime scene, she said.
"No two people have same DNA profile unless you have an identical twin," MacMillan said.
If 13 areas match 13 areas, the match is called "identity," she said.
DNA obtained from Flagg's right hand fingernails showed a full DNA profile from both Judith Flagg and Mitchell, MacMillan said.
Mitchell's attorneys are challenging the handling and storage of the material, claiming the samples of Mitchell's DNA cannot be connected to the Flagg case during the years the case had gone cold.
The trial continues today.




Reader comments
Click here to view or add reader comments