Morning Sentinel
Hearings scheduled on Plum Creek plan
Conservation, economic issues are focus of debate
By ALAN CROWELL
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel 11/26/2007

By ALAN CROWELL

Staff Writer

A plan to rezone roughly 400,000 acres in the heart of the North Woods for the biggest development project ever proposed for the region will go to public hearings next month after what has already been a tortuous journey.

Plum Creek's concept plan for its Moosehead Lake tract, which calls for creating about 1,000 house lots, along with two resorts with a total of 1,050 accommodation units and 190 employment housing units, would be the largest in the history of the state if it is approved. It would also conserve more than 400,000 acres.

The plan to allow development around Maine's largest lake, a Mecca for sportsmen and tourists for centuries and a place where Henry David Thoreau canoed and tramped, has ignited a fierce debate.

Proponents say the plan would deliver a much-needed economic boost to an area that is losing jobs and population, but opponents, including environmental advocacy groups, say it would inject sprawl into a unique and revered landscape.

More than two years since the first version of the plan was submitted in April of 2005, Catherine Carroll, director of the Land Use Regulation Commission, said her agency still receives tens of e-mails, letters or phone calls every day on the plan.

The commission has scheduled four hearings, including Dec. 1, in Greenville; Dec. 2, in Augusta; Dec. 15, in Portland; and Dec. 16, in Greenville.

Carroll said the hearings will take place over a wide geographical range to make participation easier for people who don't live near Greenville.

The proposal is big both geographically and in and the enormous task of reviewing the documents involved.

"We are able to keep up with it but it is taking an exorbitant amount of our time and resources," said Carroll.

Since Plum Creek first submitted the plan it has been revised three times. Carroll said Plum Creek has responded to comments from LURC staff and other reviewers and made significant improvements, but she said those revisions have clearly not addressed everyone's concerns.

Among those with the strongest objections are environmental advocacy organizations.

Cathy Johnson, North Woods project director at the Natural Resources Council of Maine, said the latest edition of Plum Creek's plan still amounts to sprawl.

"There will be subdivisions all over the place, there will be these two big resorts and there will be developments in areas that are prized for their unspoiled character," said Johnson.

It will also set a negative precedent for all of Maine's Unorganized Territories, she said, an area that encompasses about 10.4 million acres, roughly a quarter the size of New England.

Plum Creek, a real estate investment trust with about 8 million acres across the United States, bought the land around Moosehead in 1998 for about $200 an acre, a price that was much lower than it would have been otherwise because the land was not zoned for development.

Plum Creek's plan depends on changing the zoning of high value land to allow development and Johnson said the Land Use Regulation Commission, which oversees land management in the unorganized territories, can only approve it if the proposal will have no "undue adverse impact."

Johnson said, however, that Plum Creek's plan is simply too big and would have too drastic an effect on the character of the remote area to pass that test.

Including employee housing, Johnson said the plan calls for 2,315 accommodations, not including five new commercial development districts.

"Pulling commercial development out of Greenville and sort of scattering it around is basically the definition of sprawl," said Johnson.

Development on that scale will also affect wildlife by increasing traffic, runoff and erosion, she said. Species that will be hurt include native brook trout and the Canada lynx, said Johnson.

Moosehead Lake is now a place that offers primitive recreational opportunities -- camping in remote forestlands and canoeing along the shores of an undeveloped lake, said Johnson.

The ability to engage in those increasingly rare outdoor experiences will be lost, said Johnson, in favor of golf courses and tennis courts.

"If you want tennis, you don't need to come to Maine's North Woods to do it," said Johnson.

Beyond the broadly visible plans for development, Johnson said there is cause for concern in the fine print.

The plan proposes to change standards that now apply to development in the unorganized territories.

In Plum Creek land, for example, Johnson said the plan calls for allowing homeowners to clear a view corridor.

Currently, the land use commission's regulations do no allow that.

"We are very concerned with this whole idea of setting up two parallel sets of standards," she said.

Plum Creek spokesman Luke Muzzy, a native of Greenville, whose family has lived in that town at least five generations, said the plan would bring much-needed economic growth and predictability.

"I have watched a lot of families leave this area because they didn't have jobs and a lot of these families had the same kind of roots that I have," said Muzzy, who said he has seen the population drop by more than a quarter in the past 25 years.

The people are as much a part of the character of the area as the natural beauty, and he said the sort of development Plum Creek is proposing fits well with the Greenville community and traditional economy of the region.

"There has always been development up here. All the places we are proposing development, there is development already," said Muzzy.

What is different about what his company is proposing, is that it is planned and predictable over the next 30 years, he said.

"The whole centerpiece of this plan is over 400,000 acres of land will be off limits to development forever and open for public recreation," said Muzzy.

Those conservation easements also allow for the continuation of logging, which, besides tourism, is the region's other major industry, said Muzzy.

The development called for in the plan will also take place gradually over the next three decades, said Muzzy, and amounts to roughly the same pace the region has already been experiencing.

He said Plum Creek's proposal to allow people to view scenic areas from their homes just makes sense.

"We feel that selective clearing that is properly done will allow somebody to have a view," said Muzzy. He said people also need to understand that while Plum Creek's plan calls for land to be rezoned, before construction takes place, plans will still go have to meet regulations.

"This is not the end of it. The public will be very involved as we go forward," said Muzzy.

Alan Crowell -- 474-9534, Ext. 342

acrowell@centralmaine.com

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

previous page | next page1-10 of 11 comments:

Jack Pine of Brunswick, ME
Dec 28, 2007 2:16 PM
Stumpfel said: "But hey, anything that puts money in the pockets of NRCM. Sierra Club, etc., well that's o.k."

Do any of the firms hired by Plum Creek put money in YOUR pocket?report abuse
Erik Stumpfel of Sangerville, ME
Nov 30, 2007 9:13 AM
Concerned4 obviously has not been to Moosehead Lake recently. The lake quality and fishing have not been degraded by over-use and will not be degraded if the Plum Creek plan is approved. Concerned4's comments are typical of comments by those from away, who know absolutely nothing about the area, or at most have been here perhaps once, long ago, in the summer, yet who confidently describe local conditions, prescribe regional policy and advocate for decisions that will vitally affect and injure those who live here. I am not simply "concerned for" Piscataquis County and Moosehead Lake; I have chosen, for the past 18 years, to live and raise my family here. And I can tell you that a large majority of the year-round residents of the area - those who will be most affected by LURC's decision - are in favor of the revised Plum Creek plan. Disapproval of the plan will fritter away the opportunity to permanently protect more than 400,000 acres from development; will substantially reduce existing public access; and will injure both forestry and nature-based tourism, two economic mainstays of the region. But hey, anything that puts money in the pockets of NRCM. Sierra Club, etc., well that's o.k., even if my county's local economy and environment are injured as a result. So, let's all kill the Plum Creek plan, in order to have more private kingdom lots; more unplanned, scatter-shot development; more damage to the environment; and less public access for tourism and recreation. report abuse
LikesGuitars of Taunton, MA
Nov 27, 2007 4:00 PM
Why are people so afraid of change? Why do you think every new development project is irresponsible? I'm sure these same people will cry about job loss, general lack of opportunity, rising property taxes... come on people. Grow a little... you're not gonna turn into New Jersey, though you just may turn into the new Maine. Land of enviro-friendly affluence and cultural sophistication. Maine is truly fantastic state, here's your chance to do better than the rest of New England. Grow, while maintaining your character. Something tells me you can do it.report abuse
gary savard of lewiston, ME
Nov 26, 2007 9:06 PM
Jack Pine's 10 points sum up the whole picture, and leave very little else to be said on the subject. Hopefully the majority of Mainers and the LURC see through Plum Creek's smoke and mirrors as well as he does. This plan has only one real economic recipient, and that's Plum Creek!report abuse
concerned4 of palermo, ME
Nov 26, 2007 5:12 PM
i remember growing up on the shores of moosehead lake.as a young boy i remember the water clean and very beautifull. now with all the boats the water is brown looks like crap and the fish are not what they used to be.so lets build more houses have more people live there and my only question is this, is plum creek plan on cleaning up the lake after all these houses are built and the people help dirty up the water? i already know the answer, hell no.they will sell their land pocket the money and watch as the lake goes to hell. which brings me to exactly where plum creek should be going along with their plan. i am asking the people of this state to gather as one and spread this message to them. thank you.report abuse
Misty of Waterville, ME
Nov 26, 2007 3:40 PM
Yes, if you want the Moosehead Lake region to resemble New Jersey..then go for it. It is very sad when even our local people think this scheme will be good for the area economically. Low paying, service jobs waiting on the elite of this divided country..that is just what you will get. Make this region a special playground for the same people who benefit from all the Bush tax cuts. Yes, let us go ahead and hand over the best of Maine to the money grubbing materialistic, playboys and girls. Maybe your children can go clean their condos, or wait on them hand and foot, but if they want to enjoy the clean lake, better forget that...with that many acres of land being developed around the watershed, you can just imagine the erosion...and rich folks love green lawns so they will fertilize to their hearts content...at the expense of the water already compromised by power plants in the midwest sprewing Co2 into our environment.report abuse
me of Rockwood, ME
Nov 26, 2007 12:37 PM
JackPine...you are absolutely right. The 10 steps hit the nail right on the head! We had a leased lot for many years. We finally had a chance to buy it...less than an acre...$50,000.00. They paid $200.00 for it!! Their taxes were and still are so much less than what you and I pay. Oh...I must have lost my mind...this is progress right? The Moosehead area will wind up looking like the Sebago Lake area.....CONGESTED!!! Time to move to Alaska!!! The last person leaving the state...don't forget to turn off the lights.report abuse
Jo of Augusta, ME
Nov 26, 2007 9:49 AM
"Good paying jobs"? If you consider waiting tables and cleaning toilets "good paying jobs." Most parents want more for their kids than no-benefit, low-wage jobs waiting on rich folks from away. We Mainers should not have to sacrifice our heritage so that a company that bought for less than $200/acre because it was zoned as working forest can get richer quick by pulling the wool over the eyes of anyone who hasn't bothered to learn the truth for themselves about Plum Creek's plan. For a smart, local opinion, folks should read this op-ed: http://www.nrcm.org/news_detail.asp?news=1953report abuse
Brian of West Gardiner, ME
Nov 26, 2007 9:41 AM
Henry David Thoreau was a gay, environmental, transcendentalist, tax resister, development critic in the 1800's, and wrote the book, Civil Disobedience, an argument for individual resistance to government.

Hardly an upstanding citizen!

Today's whacko nutjobs, democrat environmental treehugging lunatics that want Maine to stay in the dark ages oppose this plan, are no doubt cut from the same mold!

The so called "Naturists" are the people destroying Maine!

Plum Creek wants to take a 25 mile by 25 mile area,(that is 625 square miles)and preserve it forever! At the same time, sell some for people to purchase for their own enjoyment!

Now that is the right way to do it!

I think that is what bothers these democrat environmentalist whacko nutjobs the most...personal ownership! They hate it and want the government to own it all!
report abuse
2Cents of Oakland, ME
Nov 26, 2007 9:31 AM
Spend a winter working and living in the Greenville area, experience all the opportunities. It takes money to live there, it's in very short supply. People who don't live there or own land there should stay out of the discussion: ie; Sierra Club,and Richy Rich from the city. There will be 400,000 acres for them to play on. People who will move there will have good jobs and create them, and pay real taxes. It will be good for Greenville and all of Maine's economy. It's all long term solution to their economy and not a short term scheme the state is trying to pull off such as uncollected gift card taxes. JOHNSON YOU ARE BEING PAID BY THE TAX PAYERS TO WORK FOR US,(NOT FOR THE SIERRA CLUB & OTHER OUT OF STATE ENTITES) NO MATTER HOW LONG IT TAKES, SURE SOUNDS LIKE YOUR MIND IS ALREADY MADE UP. PLUM CREEK HAS BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO TRIM DOWN THEIR PLAN, IT APPEARS TO NEVER BE ENOUGH FOR JOHNSON. GOV. IF YOU WANT MORE TAX MONEY, YOU SHOULD RE-THINK WHO YOU PUT IN CHARGE OF YOUR AGENCIES. THIS AGENCY & MAINE SURE DOES APPEAR TO BE A GREAT EXAMPLE OF ANTI-BUSINESS, SOMETHING MAINE CAN CLEARLY NOT AFFORD.report abuse

previous page | next page

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.