Morning Sentinel
Ex-officer likens drug war to Prohibition
By DOUG HARLOW
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Wednesday, April 04, 2007

WATERVILLE -- Retired police officer Peter Christ on Tuesday compared the contemporary war on drugs to National Prohibition of the 1920s.

He even likened the bloody St. Valentine's Day Massacre to a "drug-related shooting" in today's big cities.

"When some reporter writes a story about a drug-related shooting, the reader says, 'See what drugs cause,'" he said. "Not one reporter in 1929, when reporting on the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, referred to that as an alcohol-related shooting. They all called it what it was -- a Prohibition-related shooting."

He said the same is true today. Drug policy, drug sales and drug turf wars end up in gunplay; it is not people high on drugs shooting it out.

Therefore, he said, it is the nation's failed drug policy that is causing the problems. He is calling for the legalization -- with strict regulation and control -- of all drugs: Marijuana, cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine and LSD.

Christ, who spent 20 years as a captain on the police force of in Tonawanda, N.Y., near Buffalo, is a founding member of LEAP -- Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.

He spoke to students at Colby College on Tuesday afternoon on the topic of cocaine and later in the day in a Goldfarb lecture on the Mayflower Hill campus.

The title of the lecture was "War on Drugs? Or War on People?"

The program was sponsored by the Maine Marijuana Policy Initiative and Colby's Goldfarb Center For Public Affairs and Civic Engagement.

Christ (rhymes with wrist) said the non-profit LEAP was formed in 2002 and now has roughly 8,000 members, including 800 retired law enforcement officers.

"We are law enforcement against prohibition -- it's all drugs -- what we talk about is the policy of prohibition as being detrimental to society," he said. "We know that policy of prohibition is at the root of most of the crime and violence we associate with drugs in our society."

Christ, 60, said 75 percent of drug-related crime and violence come from people fighting over the marketplace -- who is going to sell what on what corner at what time.

"What we are about is shutting down that illegal market, so that we can take this money away from the gangsters," he said.

Christ compared the drug market to the old "numbers rackets," where illegal gambling was conducted based on what numbers came up on a given day. He said that game is still in town -- only now it is called the lottery.

"That didn't solve our gambling problem," he said. "Legalization of drugs is not to be considered as an approach to our drug problem. Legalization of drugs is about our crime and violence and today, terrorism, problems that are financing themselves off this illegal marketplace."

He said well-intentioned police and prosecutors appear to favor a policy of prohibition over a policy of regulation, all the while living with the reality that drugs are not going to go away. Drugs are available, but with no guarantee of purity or distribution sites, he said.

Christ said that, like alcohol use, drug use is not the problem. He said addiction and abuse are the problems.

He said U.S. laws target the small-time user of, say, marijuana, as a criminal, which fills the nation's jails and prisons with non-violent offenders.

He said 10 to 15 percent of all drug users are addicted. The rest are casual users.

"Any form of regulated marketplace is better than what we have now," he said. "We're going to have to figure out how to regulate these drugs. It's a war on people -- we aren't putting drugs in prison; we are putting people in prison."

He said members of LEAP believe that all of the drugs mentioned are dangerous and that they must be regulated and controlled.

"Now, here's the reality," he said. "When you chose the policy of prohibition to deal with these drugs, you give up all of your ability to regulate and control."


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

previous page | next page1-10 of 35 comments:

duaneb of Troy, ME
Apr 5, 2007 5:58 AM
I agree with Bubba. report abuse
Realworld of machias, ME
Apr 4, 2007 10:35 PM
Pot maybe but you can't take that other stuff and come out right no way chemical change to the body that is set up with it own chemical especially that shat thats made in a lab no way people would lose their reasoning I can see it now Cheech and Chongs all over the place nobody getting anything done stuff left laying around O wow man that where I left that, Thank man, people laying in the street, someone runs over them, Wow man did you feel that, What was that, I know what it was, It was a thump, It was what, You know man a thump, Man whats a thump You know man it’s a it’s a what was we talking about, I don’t remember there it goes again NOPE COULDN’T LIVE IN THAT NEIGHBERHOOD report abuse
skowreader of skowhegan, ME
Apr 4, 2007 10:12 PM
Christ is a fruit-loop , cut and run type of guy. People are right, lets make it legal and all the problems will go away. NOT!

So let me get this right, we are not winning the war on drugs, so we legalize it and surrender. We still have domestic violence...lets legalize that too.. that would surely cut down the crime rate. Just think how many empty jail cells we would have available.

The police should just leave these poor people alone that want to smoke a joint or two and catch those real offenders, like teens smoking cigarettes.report abuse
Reverb of Haverhill, MA
Apr 4, 2007 9:21 PM
Smurfette-
OK I meant "booze and tobacco vs. pot..." in my previous post; a minor omission. That is because my mind is functinal enough to spot that right away. Go back and read your other posts. Do YOU even understand what you wrote? I don't think anyone else does.report abuse
Reverb of Haverhill, MA
Apr 4, 2007 9:16 PM
Funny, you call me stupid, yet look at your lousy spelling, grammar, and your inability to construct a complete sentence, it really is sad. And I notice you didn't even attempt my challenge about booze and tobacco pot. It is because you would fail miserably. Maybe you should smoke something, it might give something to your brain that it is obviously missing.report abuse
papasmurf of skowhegan, ME
Apr 4, 2007 8:59 PM
oh and one more point reverb, you say legalize it and they won't do it!! you are high...like cigarettes right or booze yes legalize it they won't do it...spoken like a true crack headreport abuse
papasmurf of skowhegan, ME
Apr 4, 2007 8:55 PM
just a quick recap no my children don't nor have they ever seen me drink as I don't nor have they seen me do drugs or smoke as I don't.
so take your sorry crak head self and share it with a child as you will your own one day...you are so stupid reverb, are you smoking or drunkreport abuse
Leon Richard of Farmington, ME
Apr 4, 2007 8:16 PM
Turn em loose. Libertarian and Darwinist here... I think those inclined should use lots and lots and lots of drugs, early on in life, before they reproduce. That way, it will be self-limiting.

I don't need a law against drugs to protect me from it. No more than I need a law against jumping into traffic.

Too bad the assumption in Augusta and Washington, and has been for some time, that we're all idiots, maniacs, and killers, who need to be protected from each other and ourselves by the government.

What I really, really, really need, is to be left alone. I want some help, I'll call and ask for it. Until then MYOGDB,report abuse
Reverb of Haverhill, MA
Apr 4, 2007 5:06 PM
I see that there are quite a few libertarians on this board. I like it!report abuse
Reverb of Haverhill, MA
Apr 4, 2007 5:06 PM
papasmurf-
This article is about war on drugs, I have no idea why you keep bringing up the 'registry'. Lets try to stay on topic here.

As a responsible adult, I can teach my kids (when I have them) that there are responsible ways and irresponsible ways of doing just about anything. That includes the use of some substances. I will do my best, like anyone would, to prevent my kids from using pot or booze at an age that is too young, when they are not quite responsible enough to handle such things.

Your analogy is so lame. So using your 'logic', suppose a kid sees his dad drink a few. So now the kids brings booze to school, and gets other kids into it? That is just as far fetched. So please papasmurf, now don't you EVER drink while your kids might see you, I don't want your kids thinking its normal and then going to school and telling my kids that its normal that people drink! Oh the horror!

Marijuana use only seems abnormal to you because of the stigma caused by its legal classification. Using facts and logic, you cannot give me a single reason why pot should be illegal, yet tobacco and alcohol should be legal. And by the way, I hardly ever smoke, and my brain is just fine, and I have a pretty good job as a scientist. Your illogical, incoherent posts make me wonder about you though.

The point is, if you want to smoke it, you will. Legalizing it isn't going to make anyone who didn't want to, want to. If anything it will make kids less likely to rebel by smoking dope, because it won't be perceived to be illicit. Think about it: If you legalized prostitution, do you think all kinds of women get into the worlds oldest profession?report abuse

previous page | next page

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.