Friday, March 02, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
FAIRPOINT PLAN TARGETS DEBT
Wind project off Mass. meets strong resistance
Three bills seek tougher rules for petitioners
New rules for special education debated
Happy apples
AUGUSTA: Cuts to French curriculum run into opposition
HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL: Hall-Dale drops MVC title game to Mountain Valley
HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY NOTEBOOK: Different stakes in Gardiner-Winslow rivalry
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
'At the time ... he was psychotic'
Man answers door, is attacked with Mace and then robbed
FairPoint reorganization plan aims to slash company's debt
Concerns over special-education changes aired
FAIRFIELD: Clinton man, 21, arrested on rape, assault charges
Stun gun, arrest of suspect end high-speed, 2-town chase
HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY NOTEBOOK: Gardiner, Winslow take to ice again
GIRLS BASKETBALL: Skowhegan wins KVAC A title game
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
The three-day Superior Court civil trial ended late Wednesday afternoon. In a 6-3 vote, jurors voted to award 76-year-old Rodney Sawtelle $360,000, as well as $40,000 to his wife, Frances.
The Sawtelles' lawyer, Scott Lynch of Lewiston, said Rodney Sawtelle was injured when a nurse at the hospital punctured a nerve in his arm with a needle. Sawtelle, who operates a heavy-equipment garage in Wilton, can't effectively feed himself, manage paperwork at his business or perform other duties related to his work, Lynch said.
"We are very disappointed that the jury did not accept the findings of the mandatory pre-litigation screening panel that found unanimously that our doctors and nurses did not cause injury to Mr. Sawtelle," Franklin Memorial Hospital President Richard Batt said Thursday.
The screening panel, a group of three medical experts, is part of a process set up by state law when there is alleged malpractice.
"Our hospital has deep respect for the jury process but we are going to review this case to see if there are grounds for an appeal," Batt said. "We take the issue of quality care very seriously."
He said Sawtelle was a patient in January and February of 2002.
"When he was at FMH we had no reports from Mr. Sawtelle or any nurses or his doctors that there was any problem with the care he received," Batt said.
"More than four months later, he called me and alleged he had a pain in his arm that he claimed came from his care at our hospital," Batt said.
A thorough review was made of all the records and the nurses and doctors were interviewed, he said.
"We found no indication there had been a problem or that it happened here," he said.

Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
As for the board members, I refer to the board of experts set up by the government to look at malpractice issues, not the FMH board. Since it is made up of doctors, I would hardly think they will be entirely objective in their decisions.
I don't know if Mr Sawtelle is on the take with this lawsuit, I wasn't on the jury. I do know, however, many times things like this take time to manifest themselves. Obviously a jury of nine thought this was legit, and they had all the facts at hand -- we do not.report abuse
Show all 5 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.