Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Mainers urged to act against global warming
By CRAIG CROSBY
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Saturday, February 03, 2007

Today's Top Headlines
from the Kennebec Journal


All of today's: News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal

As scientists from around the globe issued the strongest warning on global warming to date, researchers in Maine were hopeful that the message of doom would finally seep from the laboratory into the home.

"The discussion is no longer whether climate change is happening, it's how likely climate change is caused by human activity," said John Zavodny, associate professor of philosophy at Unity College. "The report today says they're 90 percent sure what we've been doing since the industrial revolution is resulting in global warming. It forces us as humans to take responsibility."

Scientists for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in a report released Friday that there is at least a 90 percent chance that global warming is being caused by human activity. The report depicts ominous effects on sea levels, ice cover on the poles and extreme weather by the end of the century if the warming process continues unchecked.

The report issued by the panel, which the United Nations established in 1988, represents the research of more than 2,000 scientists appointed by 154 participating countries.

"The message is clear," said Tom Tietenberg, economics professor at Colby College and an environmental consultant. "To get a bunch of scientists, who are circumspect by their very nature, to come to this conclusion is very striking. I think this is a very strong message that action is merited and merited soon."

Researchers have suspected for years that the buildup of greenhouse gas emissions, which are generated by the burning of fossil fuels, directly leads to the warming of the planet. It has taken scientists years to process the information required to transform a theory into a near certainty, according to Gordon Hamilton, associate professor of climate science for the University of Maine's Climate Change Institute. He compared the process to the theory of plate tectonics, which was first put forward in the 1950s, but took several years to be accepted.

"You can't ever prove anything in science," Hamilton said. "Everything is a consensus or a preferred opinion."

Friday's report was the fourth released by the intergovernmental panel. The certainty of human responsibility has increased with each report.

"The work of this report confirms what we have been seeing for years," said Will Ambrose, Bates College Oceanographer. "Parts of the Alaskan town I work in are falling into the ocean, so I've experienced the impact of Arctic warming firsthand."

Scientists are calling for the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly here in the United States.

Beverly Johnson, geology professor at Bates College, said the U.S. produces up to 20 percent of all carbon dioxide emissions.

"Congress has a responsibility to act now," Johnson said.

Action will become natural once people allow the magnitude of the report's message to sink in, according to Zavodny. For the first time in history, human beings have affected the globe itself and not just a species or habitat.

"I personally think a lot of the denial that human beings, as individuals or cultures, engage in really comes from a sense of guilt, a feeling of strong moral guilt," Zavodny said. "Because we want to avoid that, we tend to ignore the impact we have.

"When people can look squarely at the reality, usually the good, the right thing to do, presents itself and it becomes very, very clear what is required of us."

Tietenberg acknowledged there is still evidence that contradicts the findings in the report, but he takes the view of an economist.

"You hold the extent and value of the data on one side against the other," Tietenberg said. "It seems to me the data on one side is overwhelming. The cost of inaction at this point is becoming extraordinarily large."

Craig Crosby -- 861-9253

ccrosby@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Leon Richard of Farmington, ME
Feb 5, 2007 7:13 AM
Seriously? Data from 1900? Wow! That far back! Holy Cow! We should be able to tell what the weather is going to be five minutes from now with data from that far back! No more surprises here!

The Global Warming Crowd is the self-aggrandizing group among us. "We're PEOPLE, and we can change the course of history of the world." Well, I got news for the whole bunch of you. The earth was here before us, and it'll be here when we're gone. The earth's temperature has waxed and waned like the tides since the beginning. There is nothing you, or all of us are going to do to change that. Don't you see it's like trying to make the day longer? Just because you put a tin foil hat on in February, doesn't mean you caused winter to go away.

So we all have an idea of what is happening here. These so-called "scientists" (a bunch of sociologists and cultural engineers) have taken all available data and are making pronouncements that would make a real scientist pull out his hair.

Take a roll of 400 sheets of toilet paper and lay it out on the floor. This is the entire history of the world. Recorded human history is the last 0.1mm of the whole roll.

Check it out...

http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/toiletpaper/history.html

We KNOW that 27,000 years ago there was a mile thick sheet of ice right here where we live. So where were the SUV's and coal fired plants? What melted the glaciers?

And people think indians and other indigenous peoples were silly, superstitious, and ignorant of science and natural phenomena? Give me a break...

How much smarter do you think the "HUMANS ARE BAD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT!" corwd is now than in the 1970s? How could the chicken littles have been so wrong? Thirty years ago, science said we were headed for the next ice age. HELLO! Explain how they could have been so wrong, just thirty years ago. Do that, and maybe you'll have me. In the meantime, it's no more meaningfull than the hairy bum with the sign, "THE END IS NEAR!report abuse
David of Jay, ME
Feb 3, 2007 11:42 PM
Promotion of fear and ignorance sells newspapers. Ths latest "report" does not represent the findings of the entire study group that is yet to be released. It amazes me that we have these climate experts at Bates and Colby.
report abuse
SpikeG of Manchester, ME
Feb 3, 2007 11:13 PM
Why don't we just continue our profligate lifestyles and self-aggrandizing attitudes? If we can convince ourselves that we have not polluted the environment irreparably, filled the ground with toxic wastes, shipped billions of pounds of toxic trash overseas, dumped filth into the oceans, then we can also assure ourselves that we are in Iraq, not because we want to protect our oil interests, but to preserve some abstraction called democracy and freedom...no need to recycle, let's just build more landfills. Where? In all the backyards of those people who decry the actions and voices of the tree-hugging liberals. No need to curb our fuel consumption, we'll just dig for oil wherever we can find it...hmmm, again, maybe in the front yards of those naysayers. How about more gravel pits so we can continue to repave roads and drive more SUV's - where can we dig?
If you think that global climate change is a figment of the left imagination, perhaps it's time to wake up and see what we've actually done to this planet. And all in someone else's back yard.report abuse
Leon Richard of Farmington, ME
Feb 3, 2007 9:10 PM
I've always felt the basic idea was to destroy the economy in the United States. I find it awfully suspiscious and hypocritical that thrid world countries and China are exempt from all this stuff. Kyoto specifically exempted them.

This truly is a batch of foolishness. No science behind it at all. And if the scientific process were being followed, we would have specific answers about what is causing the warming.

Carbon dioxide? Maybe...

Anybody remember the 1970s'? I do, and I suspect most people about 40 or so years old do. Anybody remember being told in science class another Ice Age was imminent? I remember it well. Yep, "Scientists say that for the last ten years, the temperature is going down, and because we're burning FOSSIL FUELS we're cooling the earth and another ice age is imminent."

Do these people think that this is the first wax and wane of the earth's temperature? Are we really that simple? Nothing more than the regular, millenial, cycle of "winter" and "summer". That's all it is and that is it. And it's not because we're burning gasoline, coal, and oil. It's not becuase there is carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. report abuse

Show all 17 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.