Morning Sentinel
Comments about: No SAD 59 vote on evolution question
MADISON -- School Administrative District 59 directors will not address revising the district's science curriculum...
[ back to story ]
Bookmark & share: digg del.icio.us Reddit

Welcome to onlinesentinel.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers' section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings. We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff. Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while the comment is being reviewed. Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

A Byrne of Charlottesville, VA
May 15, 2008 11:13 AM
mdenis46: Sorry, introducing creationism really can't be done in science class. The creationist (and also ID) position requires philosophical assumptions inconsistent with those for Science. (Logic, Math, and finite steps from Reality to Evidence, as I've been harping here.) It therefore can not be taught by the State as science under the disestablishmentarian requirement of the First Amendment. Certainly, if the question is raised by students the inconsistency of the assumptions might be pointed out, but to require teachers to go out of their way to do so would be tantamount to a State attack on the religions that believe it-- which would also violate the First Amendment.

Mentioning it History class is another matter entirely-- provided one treats it as only one belief among many.report abuse
Hermann Munster of AmishLand, PA
May 15, 2008 9:25 AM
mdenis - no matter how contradictory your various posts are, this isn't about letting students pick and choose, and should not be. ID is no more science than sentence structure is math.

Period.

In this instance, it appears the best course of action for the SB of the SAD is no action.report abuse
mdenis46 of Parksville, KY
May 15, 2008 8:47 AM
Creationism or intelligent design should be taught at some point in the curriculum if only as an important socially controversial issue. I used to introduce it in my US history classes, under the First Amendment as one explanation of religious freedom. One can't do justice to political and social movements in recent American history without discussing it at some point. However, it is NOT science, it does NOT belong in the science curriculum -- never has, never should.report abuse
Josh Weston of Madison, ME
May 15, 2008 8:20 AM
I wouldn't go into a Sunday school class and demand that they teach their "students" evolution, just as it is ridiculous to demand that science teachers introduce both evolution and creationism to their students.

I guess that if we are going to teach our science class students "fairly", as creationists wish we would, we would have to teach them also about the Hindu Mandala, Buddhist reincarnation and oneness, and the many other theological viewpoints regarding life and the existence of life on this planet.

Let's get real and worry about issues that are REALLY causing trouble. Like lower test scores than ever before, or "no child left behind".report abuse

Show all 7 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.