Welcome to onlinesentinel.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.

|
Comments about:
Toxicologist helps Maine revise policies Bush administration heeds American Chemistry Council request, bumps Rice from EPA panel As a 31-year-old woman, I hope to have kids in the next few years. At the same time that many of my friends are... [ back to story ] |
|



Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
Any idea who is behind mercuryfacts.org? They don't seem to be too forthcoming about who is running that organization. Could it be people in the food industry?report abuse
A onetime Environmental Protection Agency toxicologist, Dr. Deborah Rics now works for the Maine Bureau of Health. While at the EPA, she was one of three scientists responsible for determining the agency’s mercury “Reference Dose” -- a hyper-precautionary standard with a built-in tenfold safety factor. In 2005 she was hired as an “expert witness” by the losing side in a landmark California court case which ultimately ruled that the state’s Attorney General could not mandate public mercury warnings wherever canned tuna is sold.
During the trial, Dr. Rice argued in favor of setting the state’s Maximum Allowable Dose Limit (MADL) for mercury in fish so low that (in the words of Judge Robert Dondero) “all servings of fish and shellfish larger than literally a grain of rice would require a warning.” Given Rice’s questionable credentials -- she “had never calculated an MADL” and was “not Board Certified” -- the Judge was understandably skeptical of her “expert” opinion.
Ultimately, the judge dismissed Dr. Rice’s testimony as “misleading” as well as “unreliable” and “biased.”
http://www.mercuryfacts.org/activists.cfm#Ricereport abuse
Try to have a nice day! d:-)report abuse
Just another democrat avoiding the tax and spend habit in the legislature!report abuse
Show all 5 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.